OFAC SDN list vs BIS Entity List: what each one actually blocks

Comparison · 4 minute read

The SDN list restricts the relationship: US persons are generally prohibited from dealing with a listed party at all. The Entity List restricts the item: sending certain goods to a listed party needs a licence. Same name on both is possible, and the two do not cover each other.

Side by side

OFAC SDNBIS Entity List
Published byUS Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets ControlUS Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security
InstrumentSanctionsExport controls
What is restrictedDealing with the party; property and interests are blockedExport, re-export or transfer of listed items to the party
Typical licence postureProhibited unless a general or specific licence appliesLicence required, frequently with a presumption of denial
Practical questionShould we be in any commercial relationship with them at all?Are we about to send them something the entry covers?
Secondary exposureAlso relevant to ownership chains, where a listed party holds 50% or moreApplies to the named party, and the entry can extend to named fronts and aliases

Why the difference changes your decision

With an SDN hit, the decision is structural. Payment routing, contracts and future orders are all affected, and the question lands on ownership too: an entity owned half or more by a listed party can be treated as listed itself, even though its own name is nowhere on the list.

With an Entity List hit, the decision is item-level. The same customer may be entirely workable for unlisted products and closed for one specific product line. Teams that treat an Entity List hit the way they treat an SDN hit stop doing business they were allowed to do; teams that treat an SDN hit as an item question keep trading until something breaks.

Checking both without doing it twice

  1. Screen the legal name and every alias against both lists, on the same date.
  2. For an Entity List hit, read the entry's scope before you conclude anything.
  3. For an SDN hit, stop and look at ownership — not just the named party.
  4. Record the date and the list you checked. Lists change; a check with no date is not a check.

Our free instant check covers OFAC, UK, EU, UN and US BIS lists in one pass and shows you which list each entry sits on.

Frequently asked

Does a UK or EU listing have the same effect as a US one?

No. Each regime binds different people and restricts different activity. A company can be clear in one jurisdiction and restricted in another, and a bank in a third country may still decline the payment on its own risk assessment.

Is there one combined list I can trust?

Several official consolidated lists exist, but they are aggregations, and they update on their own schedules. Checking the aggregation is a reasonable first pass; when a name matches, confirm it against the issuing authority's own entry.

What this page does not do. It does not decide your case. Whether a specific shipment, payment or contract is permitted depends on facts we do not have — the item, the end use, the destination and your own compliance obligations.

Run the free checkWhat the US$100 report covers